Manjusaka <lizheao940...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> `selectors` makes underlying implementations irrelavant to most users since > we can simply use `DefaultSelector` I agree with this. > If you know you want to add EPOLL_EXCLUSIVE, why not just use `select.epoll`? I don't think so. If I use the `select` directly, that means I have to give up all the features what `selectors` support such as binding a `data` to a fd, that also means I have to do some repeat work myself. I don't think it's a good idea. So, why not change this API when we can keep the compatibility? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue35517> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
