skorpeo <skorpe...@gmail.com> added the comment: Ha, ok that would explain it. Yes, I think it would indeed be helpful to update the example, but then again I guess leaving it as is may be a good way to find out if people are reading the docs.
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 10:21 PM Martin Panter <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Martin Panter <vadmium...@gmail.com> added the comment: > > This was changed in Python 3.2+ in Issue 16723. The response object no > longer sets the “closed” attribute when it runs out of data; it is only set > when the “close” method is called. Perhaps the example should be amended so > that it checks if “read” returned an empty string, rather than checking > “closed”. > > Another problem with the example is that printing the chunk as a bytes > object can trigger BytesWarning. I would add a “repr” call to avoid that. > > ---------- > assignee: -> docs@python > components: +Documentation > nosy: +docs@python, martin.panter > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> > <https://bugs.python.org/issue35649> > _______________________________________ > ---------- title: http.client doesn't close. Infinite loop -> http.client doesn't close. Infinite loop _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue35649> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
