STINNER Victor <vstin...@redhat.com> added the comment:
> Finally, since the the port to 3.6 was a mistake, I will revert that. I wrote PR 11499 but I closed it because PR #11501 has been merged, but yeah, maybe a revert is the best option for 3.6. No problem, the status change of the 3.6 branch is very new, and not everybody got the memo ;-) https://devguide.python.org/#status-of-python-branches See this discussion: https://discuss.python.org/t/remove-needs-backport-to-3-6-label/563 ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue24746> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com