Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdr...@gmail.com> added the comment:
The 3.X docs generally don't refer to the 2.X series.
What that comment is pointing out is that leaving the field identifier out (the
number inside the {...} placeholder syntax) was not in the 3.0, but added in
3.1.
Unfortunately, I don't have a 3.0 interpreter available to show the exception
that's raised.
No change is required.
----------
nosy: +fdrake
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35831>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
