James Davis <davis...@vt.edu> added the comment:
Thanks for your thoughts, Raymond. I understand that the alternation has
"short-circuit" behavior, but I still find it confusing in this case.
Consider these two:
Regex pattern matched? matched string captured
content
-------------------- -------------------- --------------------
--------------------
(ab|a)*?b True ab
('',)
(ab|a)+?b True ab
('',)
In order to satisfy the first "(ab|a)+?" clause the regex engine has to find at
least one match for (ab|a), and still match the final "b" clause of the pattern.
In this case, although "(ab|a)" will match "ab", doing so would cause the
overall pattern to mismatch. So it seems like in order to obtain the match
(which it does, see the second column), the regex engine must proceed past the
first "ab" into the "a" part of the OR. But then I would expect the capture
group to contain "a" and it does not.
For what it's worth, I also tried the match /(ab|a)*?b/ in PHP, Perl, Java,
Ruby, Go, Rust and Node.js. The other 7 regex engines all matched "ab" and
captured "a". Only Python's re module matches with an empty capture -- and even
here it disagrees with the Python "regex" module as I noted in my initial post.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35859>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
