Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettin...@gmail.com> added the comment:

I concur with all the other -1 comments and will mark this a closed.

FWIW, we generally discourage sweeping across the library with minor rewrites.  
Guido articulated a principle of "holistic refactoring" where we make code 
improvements while working on the module as a whole.  This helps makes sure 
that code changes are made in the context of a thorough understanding of what 
the module is trying to do.  This also helps us reduce maintenance-induced-bugs 
where minor code adjustments create new bugs that weren't there before.

Thank you for taking a look at the source and please continue to do so. If you 
find a specific case that is problematic, feel free to post that one particular 
case.  That said, a better use of time is to take one of the many open tracker 
issues, research it, and propose a fix.

----------
nosy: +rhettinger
resolution:  -> not a bug
stage:  -> resolved
status: open -> closed

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue36039>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to