Eric Snow <[email protected]> added the comment:
@Armin, thanks for fixing things on your end so quickly. :)
Adding PyInterpreterState.dict and a public getter function (a la
PyThreadState) is probably fine. I'm just not sure how that relates to the
problem with cffi's use of the "builtins" field. If it would be useful in
general then feel free to open a separate issue. I doubt there'd be much
opposition if you presented a decent use case, since the cost would be low.
In the case of PyInterpreterState.builtins specifically, if you need it we
could add a simple PyInterpreterState_GetBuiltins(). However, couldn't you
already use existing public API, e.g. `PyEval_GetBuiltins()` or
`PyImport_GetModule("builtins")`? Regardless, we certainly don't want to put
anyone in a position that they must define Py_BUILD_CORE just for access to
PyInterpreterState fields.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35886>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
