Eric Snow <ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com> added the comment:

At least, it *might* be a performance regression.  Here are the two commits I 
tried:

after:  ef4ac967e2f3a9a18330cc6abe14adb4bc3d0465 (PR #11617, from this issue)
before:  463572c8beb59fd9d6850440af48a5c5f4c0c0c9 (the one right before)

After building each (a normal build, not debug), I ran the micro-benchmark 
Raymond referred to ("./python Tools/scripts/var_access_benchmark.py") multiple 
times.  There was enough variability between runs from the same commit that I'm 
uncertain at this point if there really is any performance regression.  For the 
most part the results between the two commits are really close.  Also, the 
results from the "after" commit fall within the variability I've seen between 
runs of the "before" commit.

I'm going to try with the "performance" suite 
(https://github.com/python/performance) to see if it shows any regression.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33608>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to