Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr. <bs...@allcaps.org> added the comment:

It's up to you how you folks want to deal with this, but classifying it as a 
"bug" for those versions in bugfix is likely acceptable.

You already have to call bind with a tuple, so as long as it is *optional* to 
add an extra field to that tuple (and I can't imagine that any fix would not do 
that as it would break existing code), it's not going to break things.

However, since nobody seems to have felt the need to file this, fixing this in 
3.8 is probably just fine.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue36132>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to