Yury Selivanov <yseliva...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> And the same tokenizer trick that detects 'async def' could detect 'async > for' easily. Exactly. I just never thought that we could support async generator expressions with the kind of hacks in tokenizer we had in 3.5-3.6. FWIW I still believe that it's better for async & await tokens to be proper keywords, but in case we ever realize we want them to become "soft" keywords we apparently have options. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue35975> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
