Paul Ganssle <p.gans...@gmail.com> added the comment:
I also think it would be ideal to avoid getting into too much detail about the definitions of UTC and GMT in a general sense. Instead, we should probably refer to some better source on the matter and maybe focus on how UTC and GMT are used *in this document*? For example, the `gmtime` function is explicitly defined in terms of UTC in the documentation, and just has a possibly slightly inaccurate name. Perhaps a wording like "Occasionally the abbreviations 'GMT' and 'UTC' are used interchangeably, despite the fact that this is somewhat inaccurate. For more information about the difference between UTC and GMT, see <external source>." As something of an aside, the same bullet point says this: > The acronym UTC is not a mistake but a compromise between English and French. This came up recently on the tz mailing list, where it was claimed that there is no contemporary evidence to support this: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz/2019-March/027736.html It may be worth removing this sentence or rewording it to be more neutral, like "The acronym UTC is not a mistake but conforms to an earlier, language-agnostic naming scheme for time standards: UT0, UT1, etc." I can move the discussion of the "UTC acronym" wording into a separate ticket if it's distracting from this one. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue36240> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
