Daniel Black <dys...@gmail.com> added the comment:
I see! Okay... I'll consider a solution to the filetype portion of the mimetypes map. Do you happen to know which other modules may depend on that structure? Yes... the lightning is silly. Dan Black http://dan.black 917-873-3970 On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:55 AM R. David Murray <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com> added the comment: > > That link should do for our purposes here. > > The fact that it is an 'x-' mimetype means it has not been approved at > any level. There might be an in progress application to the mimetype > registry, but if so the web site doesn't mention it anywhere obvious. > > I'm not sure about the filetype problem, but I'm guessing amp isn't the > only mimetype that will have this issue going forward, so we probably need > to come up with a solution. You don't need support from the mimetypes > module to create or manipulate emails using the content-type, though, > so it isn't a blocker on that side. > > That lightning thing is *seriously* hokey :( > > ---------- > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> > <https://bugs.python.org/issue36460> > _______________________________________ > ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue36460> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com