Daniel Black <dys...@gmail.com> added the comment:

I see! Okay... I'll consider a solution to the filetype portion of the
mimetypes map. Do you happen to know which other modules may depend on that
structure?

Yes... the lightning is silly.

Dan Black
http://dan.black
917-873-3970

On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:55 AM R. David Murray <rep...@bugs.python.org>
wrote:

>
> R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com> added the comment:
>
> That link should do for our purposes here.
>
> The fact that it is an 'x-' mimetype means it has not been approved at
> any level.  There might be an in progress application to the mimetype
> registry, but if so the web site doesn't mention it anywhere obvious.
>
> I'm not sure about the filetype problem, but I'm guessing amp isn't the
> only mimetype that will have this issue going forward, so we probably need
> to come up with a solution.  You don't need support from the mimetypes
> module to create or manipulate emails using the content-type, though,
> so it isn't a blocker on that side.
>
> That lightning thing is *seriously* hokey :(
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
> <https://bugs.python.org/issue36460>
> _______________________________________
>

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue36460>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to