Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> added the comment:
So Terry is correct in so much as there is no parameter name. :) Both of the functions in question are positional-only, so the name actually doesn't matter beyond giving a way to reference the parameter in the documentation. So thanks for the PR, Marco, but I'm going to reject this as there's nothing actually wrong with the gdbm or ndbm docs. ---------- resolution: -> rejected stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue36322> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
