Colin Dick <colin...@gmail.com> added the comment:
No, the first example is expected, BUT the middle two work HENCE the last should NOT have a problem either... No? Because the middle two work, so should the last complete without any errors. There were no code changes, Therefore the problem is with python On Wed, 3 Apr 2019, 23:42 Ronald Oussoren <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Ronald Oussoren <ronaldousso...@mac.com> added the comment: > > This is not a bug: > > * "python -m NAME" runs module (or package) NAME as a script, NAME should > therefore be a module name and not a filename (and hence not have a .py > suffix) > > * "python NAME" runs a script in file NAME and should therefore by a > complete file name, including a suffix when the file name has a suffix. > > In your examples "python -m vixsd.py" and "python vixsd" correctly raise > an error. > > ---------- > nosy: +ronaldoussoren > resolution: -> not a bug > stage: -> resolved > status: open -> closed > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> > <https://bugs.python.org/issue36514> > _______________________________________ > ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue36514> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
