STINNER Victor <vstin...@redhat.com> added the comment:
> The CVE-2019-9740 has been assigned to the bpo-36276 I don't know how CVE are assigned. Since this issue started with "the patch in CVE-2016-5699 can be broke by an addition space", would it make sense to reuse CVE-2016-5699 rather than using a new CVE? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue30458> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
