Marc-Andre Lemburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: On 2008-12-05 11:24, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc wrote: > Amaury Forgeot d'Arc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > > Yes, it is the full traceback. > > The modules are not compiled nor imported. > But to load the source code, importer.find_module() needs to open the > file in text mode, so it calls PyTokenizer_FindEncoding() (this is the > second failure, with test.badsyntax_pep3120.py), then the encoding is > used to decode text (this is the first failure, with test.bad_coding.py)
I see. >> Instead, pydoc should just say that a module was not specified >> and be done with it. > > I'm not sure to understand. Sorry, I didn't see the attached PNG screenshot until now. Forget that comment. What I don't understand is that this works: help> modules Please wait a moment while I gather a list of all available modules... ... while this doesn't: help> modules web Here is a list of matching modules. Enter any module name to get more help. Traceback (most recent call last): ... Shouldn't the first method also cause a traceback ? _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue4540> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
