Inada Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> If you want to limit to 16-20 that may be ok but `cpu_count + 4` doesn't work > in this case. On cloud servers, I see 128 or even more cores very often. > 160+4 is not that you want to propose, sure. I proposed cpu_count + 4 because #24882 almost fixed the problem of large maxworks. If you don't like it, how about min(32, cpu_count+4)? > I insist on changing the default calculation schema in concurrent.futures, > not in asyncio. There is no case for asyncio to be exceptional. Makes sense. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue35279> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
