Terji <terj...@yahoo.com> added the comment:
>> If there were special dunders __all__ and __any__ it would be easy to >> encapsulate this behaviour inside the range objects themselves, and neither >> any() nor all() would need to know anything about range objects. This sounds very interesting, and more general. It would be useful for e.g. numpy arrays, where ``all(arr)`` currently is slower than ``arr.all()``. Don't know it there's a reason it wasn't implemented this way originally? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue37131> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
