Jeroen Demeyer <j.deme...@ugent.be> added the comment:

I would argue for the pragmatic solution: PR 14193 fixes that old 
Cython-generated code. More generally, it fixes API compatibility and doesn't 
make ABI compatibility worse than the status quo (the proposal of putting back 
tp_print in place of tp_vectorcall_offset does).

Of course, it may not fix every single use case, but even if we can't fix that 
hypothetical 0.1%, we can still fix the 99.9%.

The proposed fix is very small and only applied to 3.8, so there is no 
long-term maintenance burden. So the obvious question: why not? What's wrong 
with PR 14193?

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37250>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to