Terry J. Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> added the comment:
For myself, I only want this for 'large' outputs. I prefer something like the
following left alone.
>>> help('continue')
The "continue" statement
************************
continue_stmt ::= "continue"
"continue" may only occur syntactically nested in a "for" or "while"
loop, but not nested in a function or class definition within that
loop. It continues with the next cycle of the nearest enclosing loop.
When "continue" passes control out of a "try" statement with a
"finally" clause, that "finally" clause is executed before really
starting the next loop cycle.
Related help topics: while, for
The threshhold for squeezer should be good enough. I think of this as
autosqueeze + autoexpand if this if the first output after '>>>' and the
statement began with 'help('. An advantage of doing it this way is that the
squeezer button remains after dismissing the viewer.
Also, I suspect that most people who disable squeezer would not like this
either.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37768>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
