Juan Telleria <jteller...@gmail.com> added the comment:
There was a positive response from package mantainers for this issue :) See: https://github.com/sspipe/sspipe/issues/4 >> is the module mature and stable? I am using this module in my own projects for a while and it satisfies my own requirements. However, I think if we want to propose it as a PEP, we should plan for a 1.0.0 release with some improvements on the API and documentation and tests. >> does it have an FOSS licence compatible with Python, and if not, are the >> authors willing to re-licence it? I am willing to re-licence it. >> are the authors willing to donate the module to Python? Yes >> are the authors happy to change their release schedule to match Python? Yes >> are they happy to adhere to Python's policy on backwards compatibility and >> new functionality? Yes >> are you (or the authors) willing to write a PEP proposing to add this module >> to the standard library? https://www.python.org/dev/peps/ Yes, with your contribution. >> can you find a Core Developer willing to sponsor this PEP? (You can probably >> ask on the Python-Dev or Python-Ideas mailing lists, or the Python Discuss, >> or face-to-face in person at a sprint, etc.) We may try. I will request support for this project in Python-Dev and Pytgon-Ideas during this week by sending an e-mail. Thank you also Steven for your bullet points to complete! Juan ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue38052> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
