Kyle Stanley <aeros...@gmail.com> added the comment:

> IHMO a test must not depend on time.

I would agree, the tests should optimally not depend on time. My above comment 
was primarily to confirm that the failure was able to be consistently 
reproduced, along with the minimum conditions to do so.

Yury had been the one to change it to "asyncio.sleep(0.05)" from the previous 
"asyncio.sleep(1)" in the following commit: 
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/abe9625eeb71e40f042ccfccfe6a4489a6dcdf35
 (Nov 13, 2015).

Perhaps he might have some insight or ideas as to how we could improve the test 
to use a more reliable means of synchronization that has been implemented since 
that change was made. I'll add him to the nosy list.

----------
nosy: +yselivanov

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38564>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to