Batuhan <batuhanosmantask...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> I do not think that adding an extra parameter to .read() will solve any > problem. There is a use case of this (which some of tools depends) about checking if configuration exists and if not, raising an error. Now, they can solve this by just adding check_exist argument. > Changing the default behavior will break existing code. Can you give an example of how this feature can/could break existing code? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue35448> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
