Yury Selivanov <yseliva...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> Well, I'm basically using a run method defined as a shorthand for > self.loop.run_until_complete (without closing loop, reusing it throughout). > It would be nice if asyncio.run could simply be used instead, but I > understand you're saying this is easier said than done, which is fine with > me. Thanks. Yes. `asyncio.run()` is similar to `loop.run_until_complete()` but adds some guarantees + sane setup/cleanup. If we strip proper cleanup then there's no point in `asyncio.run()`. So using `loop.run_until_complete()` is totally fine when you want to preserve the event loop between runs. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue38599> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
