Yury Selivanov <yseliva...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> I'm going to have to rescind the above statements. I was able to implement a > new prototype of asyncio.ThreadPool (using ThreadPoolExecutor) that spawns > it's threads asynchronously on startup. Since this one a bit more involved > than the previous code examples, I created a gist: > https://gist.github.com/aeros/8a86de6b13f17b9f717ea539ee1ee78f Nice work! This is a great excercise, but we can really just use concurrent.futures.ThreadPool as is. Spawning threads is fast. As I mentioned before all we need to do is to design *our* API to NOT initialize pools in __init__, that's it. The design outlined in https://bugs.python.org/msg355881 would do that. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue32309> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
