Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> added the comment:
Hm, here's what I measure in Python 3.8.1. (I don't use IPython or notebooks so this looks a little different.) >>> timeit.timeit('Foo()', 'class Foo: pass') 0.37630256199999934 >>> timeit.timeit('Foo()', 'class Foo:\n def __new__(cls): return >>> super().__new__(cls)') 1.5753196039999864 >>> timeit.timeit('Foo()', 'from typing import Generic, TypeVar\nT = >>> TypeVar("T")\nclass Foo(Generic[T]): pass') 3.8748737150000068 >From this I conclude that adding a minimal __new__() method is responsible for >about 4x slowdown, and the functionality in typing.py for another factor 2.5. While this isn't great I don't see an easy way to improve upon this without rewriting the entire typing module in C. (Some of this may or may not happen for PEP 604.) PS. I just realized my Python binary was built with debug options, so absolute numbers will look different (better) for you -- but relative numbers will look the same, and I get essentially the same factors with 3.9.0a1+. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue39168> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com