Kyle Stanley <aeros...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> It would certainly be better to start the worker processes on demand. It > probably also requires careful thought about how to detect that more workers > are required. Alright. In that case, I'll do some experimentation when I get the chance and see if I can come up with an effective way to spawn the worker processes as needed, without incurring a significant performance penalty. Note: I have a few other projects and obligations in the meantime, so I'm not 100% certain when I'll have the time to work on this. If anyone else is interested in working on this as well, certainly feel free to do so. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue39207> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
