STINNER Victor <vstin...@python.org> added the comment:
> 3rd party: IMHO, if somebody relies on the error message, not error type, I > think that the code pattern is bad usage I don't think that we can be pedantic on how projects should be tested. IMHO it's too risky. I rejected backports. The risk of regression in a *minor* release is just too high. Such "cleanup" change is better fitted for a new 3.x major release. ---------- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed versions: -Python 3.7, Python 3.8 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue39200> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
