Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettin...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> I assumed that Level1A should already be in scope while defining > the insides of Level1B. But it isn't. That analysis is correct. Class namespaces don't nest like functions do. The "enclosing" namespace is globals, not the surrounding class. This isn't a bug, but it is understandable why you might assume otherwise. ---------- nosy: +rhettinger resolution: -> not a bug stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue40033> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
