Tim Peters <t...@python.org> added the comment:

To be serious about numpy ;-) , people consuming a great many random outputs 
will eventually move to numpy out of necessity (speed).  So for that reason 
alone it's good to mimic what they do. But more fundamentally, they have more 
people with relevant deep knowledge contributing to the project than Python 
has. When, e.g., they were considering a Twister alternative, PCG's inventor 
contributed extensively to their discussion, and even created a new member of 
the PCG family to address concerns raised by numpy contributors' testing - sll 
_before_ it was released.

Apart from Mark chiming in, the Python project just doesn't get that level of 
help in these areas.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40346>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to