Eric Snow <ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com> added the comment:
>From a user perspective, does it make sense to have a different >recursion_limit per interpreter? I don't see a problem with it. However, >does it make sense to also keep a global value that we default to when a >per-interpreter value is not set? I think it might. I suppose a bigger question is what users will expect the recursion limit (AKA "sys.getrecursionlimit()") to be for a newly created subinterpreter. Will it be some global default? Will it be the value from the parent interpreter? I'd go with a global default, which would imply that the default value should be stored under _PyRuntimeState like we had it (but still keep the actual per-interpreter field for the actual value). FWIW, the existing docs don't really block either approach. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue40513> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
