Paul Ganssle <p.gans...@gmail.com> added the comment:
This is a duplicate of bpo-40714. It's a bit of an overzealous compiler warning (as far as I can tell it's not true that the uninitialized value would ever be used), but we fixed it anyway in GH-20291. Thanks for the report! ---------- nosy: +p-ganssle resolution: -> duplicate stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue40713> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
