Fantix King <fantix.k...@gmail.com> added the comment:

Oh thank you for the clue, that's super helpful! Let me try locally.

This fix PR was originally done to solve a hanging call in a race condition, so 
the test would hang forever if the fix is not working as expected. The 10 
seconds wait_for() is to make sure that we don't end up with a test hanging 
forever.

If enlarging the timeout works in some of your cases, that really inspires me 
on a potential cause of the issue in the test. To simulate the race condition 
specifically for loop.sock_sendall(), I needed a connected socket with a full 
send buffer so that the next sock_sendall() call would block. To achieve this, 
I wrote something like this:

    with self.assertRaises(BlockingIOError):
        while True:
            sock.send(b' ' * 5)

And another loop in a subtask to consume the data:

    while not data:
        data = await self.loop.sock_recv(server, 1024)
        data = data.strip()

It might be that it cost too much time in these loops (especially the 2nd one 
because the logs showed that it was blocked on calling sock_sendall()). But 
that's just a guess yet, let me add some more debug logs and test locally.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue30064>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to