Michael Felt <aixto...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment: I’ll switch back to xlc ( even try without the _r ) and look for the macro asap (vacation and occasional travel).
Sent from my iPhone > On 15 Jun 2020, at 21:20, Stefan Krah <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > > Stefan Krah <ste...@bytereef.org> added the comment: > > Thanks! > > Ha, it turns out that c99_r has excellent C99 compliance. :) > >> Variable arguments macro RAISE_SYNTAX_ERROR was invoked with an empty >> variable argument list. > > Totally legit, we should use xlc (at least the front end) more often. > > > So maybe our code base is not C99 compliant enough and we have to switch back > for sanity. > > > > For the _decimal problem at hand, if you give me the compiler identification > macro (__xlc__ or something?) I can try the same as for MSVC and use the > explicit EXTINLINE definition. > > ---------- > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> > <https://bugs.python.org/issue40878> > _______________________________________ > ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue40878> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
