Gabriel Genellina <gagsl-...@yahoo.com.ar> added the comment:
The current behaviour is actually a requested feature: see #449227
I see your point, it may be annoying sometimes -- but calling a method
is far more common than just getting a reference to it, so I think the
current behaviour is fine (I'm talking about the added "(", not the
repeated entries, nor the unneeded __bases__ recursion, nor the deleted
entries)
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5062>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
