Tim Peters <t...@python.org> added the comment:
I may well have misread the code, believing it can still allow spurious over/underflows. On second reading of the current file, I don't know - it's more complicated than I thought. If it does guarantee to prevent them, then I shift from -1 to (probably ) -0. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue41458> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
