Wolfgang Fahl <w...@bitplan.com> added the comment:
Indeed this a request for improvement. Technically the software works as expected. Just thousands of programmers have extra debug effort at this tate of affairs as can be deducted from the view count in the stackoverflow questions. The extra step of looking up the column name from the binding number can be avoided as i have shown by my workaround. To hide the detail of set it globally before doing that (sqlite3.paramstyle = 'named'). here in the bug report is not helpful. Part of the request is also to show the record number in executeMany - just to make lifer easier for users for sqlite3 ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue41638> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
