Shantanu <hauntsani...@gmail.com> added the comment:
I was working on updating typeshed stubs to reflect this change. It looks like the parameter wasn't actually added to the base class (https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/c3a651ad2544d7d1be389b63e9a4a58a92a31623/Lib/concurrent/futures/_base.py#L608), even though it's documented as having the new parameter (https://docs.python.org/3.9/library/concurrent.futures.html#concurrent.futures.Executor.shutdown). Is this intentional? If not, I'd be happy to submit a PR adding the parameter to the base class. ---------- nosy: +hauntsaninja _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue39349> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
