Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettin...@gmail.com> added the comment:
If someone does develop an interest in this, feel free to re-open. Personally, I'm sure that I would use int.bit_at() but only once every five years ;-) Also, it would be only half a solution unless accompanied by int.replace_bit_at(). ---------- resolution: -> rejected stage: needs patch -> resolved status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue19915> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
