Steven D'Aprano <steve+pyt...@pearwood.info> added the comment:
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 04:37:28PM +0000, Damian Yurzola wrote: > I was inspired to file this bug after reading through a multiplicity > of bugs introduced by folks confused by the library's behavior. Are these public bug reports or private anecdotes? I'm not saying that the method cannot be deprecated or removed, but it needs to be justified. We don't break people's code gratuitiously, at least not intentionally. If you make a good enough case for deprecating the method, we can do so. > What do you say about the unnecessarily redefined properties? > > Lines Lib/datetime.py#L1606 to datetime.py#L1620 I don't know. Do all the tests still pass if you take them out? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue41904> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
