New submission from Neil Schemenauer <nas-pyt...@arctrix.com>:
It is great that access to ob_type has been cleaned up to use an access macro. There are two spots that still need fixing. I think we should do something to help avoid this kind of thing slipping into the code in the future. E.g. a special build flag that renames the ob_type member would work. I'll make a separate bug for that. ---------- assignee: vstinner components: Interpreter Core messages: 379155 nosy: nascheme, vstinner priority: normal severity: normal stage: patch review status: open title: Fix reference to ob_type in unionobject.c and ceval type: enhancement _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue42099> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
