Ken Jin <kenjin4...@gmail.com> added the comment:
@guido, Aesthetics-wise, I agree that ((int, int), str) looks by far the best. My gripe with it lies with the implementation - almost every function in typing currently assumes that every object in __args__ is a type, having (int, int) - the tuple object - requires many changes especially to TypeVar substitution and repr. I thought that (tuple[int, int], str) looked fine because the positional arguments passed to a function can be represented by a single tuple (and also no need for imports in collections.abc :)! ). However, I support (int, int, str) too for the backwards-compatibility reasons you stated. The only downside to that is that Callable's __args__ will be slightly harder to parse if more args representing other things are added in the future. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue42195> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
