Kevin Rasmussen <kj_...@hotmail.com> added the comment:
Question: Why should it be zeropadded to 2? Answer: Why wouldn't it be zeropadded to match the rest of the library? Honestly it just seemed like an inconsistency with the rest of the datetime module. It caught me off guard when I went I tried to pull __str__ of a timedelta and the padding was different than what I saw elsewhere. I figured it could potentially be a quick fix if the current behaviour is not desired. I'm curious why that would have been rejected if it was even considered/noticed before. Do you know of any good way to figure out if this was discussed before? So far all I have done for searching was a search of issues that were already brought up and I didn't find anything at first glance. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue42817> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
