Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Thanks for the report. I'm going to close here, since this isn't a bug. If you want to advocate for a behaviour change, by all means go ahead, but be aware that it would likely be a hard sell. The main challenge would be finding a way to change the behaviour that doesn't abruptly break existing code that depends on the current semantics. ---------- resolution: -> not a bug stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue42936> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
