Pablo Galindo Salgado <pablog...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> private api sounds fine too -- I thought it was necessary to implement the > module (as it needs external linkage) but if it isn't then even better We can make it builtin the same way we do for the _ast module, or we can have a new module under Modules (exposing the symbols in the dynamic table) **but** making them private (and not documented), which explicitly goes against what this issue proposes. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue3353> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
