Terry J. Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> added the comment:
If IDLE were to recalculate the end from start, it would have to more or less parse forward to find the end of the statement. This is why I considered it a speculative wish. > would `end_lineno=None` make any sense? Only as a kludge if a default were required because of the signature position. Point 3: The existing doc implies but does not exactly state that the _Object signature are private, so that we could break any possibly existing (but possibly not, and discouraged) use. I think back-compatibility is discussed in the devguide. Posts do not have a link until distributed, and then you can find it on mail.python.org. The title is sufficient to do that. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue38307> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
