Vladimir Feinberg <v...@sisudata.com> added the comment: Oh, yes, I suppose, that'll truncate to just the first TracebackException.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 4:38 PM Irit Katriel <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Irit Katriel <iritkatr...@yahoo.com> added the comment: > > I meant to catch the exception in the constructor’s recursive call, and if > necessary then the same again in format (if there are more function calls > per exception in format, it will be necessary. The unit test from the 3.10 > patch will tell). > > Would that not work? > > ---------- > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> > <https://bugs.python.org/issue43048> > _______________________________________ > ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue43048> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
