Eric Snow <ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> I am confused. How can widening the usable number of functions (i.e. using > the whole C-API rather than the limited API) help c-extension modules be > usable in subinterpreters? Aren't the same singletons, exception types, and > other types exposed in the full C-API? If Py_LIMITED_API is defined then things would stay the same. Otherwise we would replace the names with macros to do the appropriate lookup. (That isn't the whole story since the Py*_Type names are PyTypeObject and not PyObject*.) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue43503> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
