Gregory P. Smith <g...@krypto.org> added the comment:

I really suggest a simple rollback (revert) of the change rather than a 
redo-fix for 3.9.4.  Unless you like the idea of a possible 3.9.5 if the 
redo-fix itself has issues that haven't been given due thought in the rush to 
undo the 3.9.3 mistake.

This leaves more time for a proper fix of bpo-42500 in 3.9 not crafted under 
duress.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue43710>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to