Gregory P. Smith <g...@krypto.org> added the comment:
I really suggest a simple rollback (revert) of the change rather than a redo-fix for 3.9.4. Unless you like the idea of a possible 3.9.5 if the redo-fix itself has issues that haven't been given due thought in the rush to undo the 3.9.3 mistake. This leaves more time for a proper fix of bpo-42500 in 3.9 not crafted under duress. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue43710> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com