New submission from Matteo Dell'Amico <de...@linux.it>: I feel that the "pairwise" recipe could be slightly more elegant if "for elem in b: break" became a simpler next(b) (or b.next() for Python 2.x). It is also more natural to modify the recipes to suit one's needs (e.g., returning items with a given gap between them, or convert the recipe to k-wise iteration).
---------- assignee: georg.brandl components: Documentation messages: 82626 nosy: della, georg.brandl severity: normal status: open title: Modification to "pairwise" in itertools recipes _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue5350> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
